China’s artificial intelligence (AI) regulations reflect Xi Jinping’s attempt at authoritarian and patriarchal social control — but also offer meaningful protections against a precarious technology. As the U.S.-China “tech war” wages on, the United States should formulate its own AI laws. Otherwise, it risks ceding some regulatory leadership to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Executive Summary
- The Chinese government in recent years has proven adept at formulating and implementing AI regulations — which the United States notably has not. AI regulations should be integrated into U.S. thinking about technology competition in the 21st century.
- This paper examines two of China’s pioneering regulatory documents: one that addresses deepfakes (the Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services) and one that addresses algorithmic management (Provisions on the Management of Algorithmic Recommendations in Internet Information Services). They invoke an adherence to the “correct political direction” as devised by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership — but also outline prudent and enforceable AI regulations.
- Among Xi Jinping’s many troublingly repressive tendencies is his attempt to achieve patriarchal control over the moral development of Chinese citizens — and, more specifically, China’s technology companies and the people who run them. China has many practical reasons to regulate AI. But one reason the government has implemented the precise language present in its regulations — centered on ensuring that AI enhances, not threatens, CCP rule — is Xi Jinping’s obsession with making sure no alternate center of power develops, in part by ensuring that a culture of misogyny thrives.
- However, even though China’s laws are embedded in an authoritarian and patriarchal governance structure, many of the provisions, such as preventing the circulation of deepfakes, are not inherently authoritarian. Aspects of China’s regulations could therefore potentially be tested and applied in liberal democratic societies.
- So far, there is little evidence that the U.S. government has a strong appetite for developing concrete AI regulations. Among U.S. firms, the rush to compete (the “AI arms race”) is likely to further stifle already stalled efforts to agree on AI ethics and standards.
- The Chinese government, free from the burden of compromise, can more swiftly and secretly resolve its internal differences and regulate AI in ways that reflect Xi Jinping’s conception of right and wrong.
- This paper argues that as the United States engages in an accelerating technology competition with China, it should comparably compete on effectively regulating AI.
To read this article please click here.
Our thanks to Johanna Costigan of the Asia Society for kindly sharing these insights.